Cannabis cultivation is not new, but beginning in the 1990s when states began to legalize medical marijuana and recently as state laws evolved, decriminalizing and legalizing recreational use of cannabis, the burgeoning industry has brought with it environmental implications, including of water and energy use.

Energy consumption for cannabis cultivation can be incredibly significant and vary widely between different methods of growing but any way you measure it, it is huge. Anecdotally, last year in Boulder County, Colorado during the second quarter of 2015, a modest 5,000 square foot indoor cannabis facility was consuming over 29,000 kWh of electricity each month. A single family home in Colorado might be consuming about 630 kWh.

Water is also dramatic in cannabis production, as it can with other agricultural uses. Water consumption data for cannabis is scarce, but at least one scientific study determined that a mature cannabis plant can consume up to 22.7 liters of water per day in a 150 day growing season. By comparison, a wine grape plant uses approximately 12.64 liters of water per day.

Moreover, most governments have not begun to consider matters of pesticide and fertilizer use in cultivation, not mention matters of fungicides used in post growing production and much more. Tobacco in cigarettes is highly regulated, but ‘not so much’ for cannabis. And what is regulated by most jurisdictions today are matters of security surrounding cannabis but not environmental concerns.

Boulder County, in one of the few regulatory efforts to address increased cannabis production, created a requirement for renewable energy and an Energy Impact Offset Fund. Cannabis cultivation operations must either directly offset 100% of electricity and any natural gas, liquid fuel, bio‐fuel or propane consumption through a subscription in a Community Solar Garden, renewable energy generated on site, or equivalent approved by the Building Official or pay a monthly fee of 2.16 cents per kWh into the Energy Impact Offset Fund.

In Washington State, Mason County Public Utility District made the decision to have an electricity rate classification specifically for emergent legal cannabis producers and processors. The rate producers and processors pay falls between the small commercial and large commercial energy rates.

In Oregon the Cannabis Environmental Best Practices Task Force has approved recommendations expected to be presented to the legislature later this month. The draft report recommends:

(1) Support access to education and technical assistance related to best cultivation practices;

(2) Support the creation of voluntary third party certification programs;

(3) Encourage research into cannabis issues, including environmental best practices, health, and other aspects of the cannabis sector; and

(4) Investigate water regulations for small‐scale producers.

Should the legislature tackle these issues, Oregon may be the national model for environmentally friendly cannabis production, at this time when little regard has been given to environmental issues in the rapid expansion of legal cannabis.